Skip to content
The Kids Research Institute Australia logo
Donate

Discover . Prevent . Cure .

How training affects Australian paediatricians' management of obesity

Secondary care could be the optimal sector for managing child and adolescent obesity, given low primary care uptake and limited tertiary services.

Authors:
Wake M, Campbell MW, Turner M, Price A, Sabin MA, Davis E, Baur LA

Authors notes:
Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2013;98(1):3-8

Keywords:
Obesity, paediatric training, competence, diagnosis, obesity management

Abstract:
Secondary care could be the optimal sector for managing child and adolescent obesity, given low primary care uptake and limited tertiary services.

We aimed to determine Australian paediatricians' self-reported competence and training in managing obesity and, in a linked patient-level audit, whether these predict rates of measurement and obesity diagnosis.

Of 166 (44.7% response) paediatricians, most felt very/quite competent in assessing (89%) and managing (68%) obesity, but few in making a difference to obesity (20%) or managing hypertension (45%), insulin resistance (32%), fatty liver disease (22%) or dyslipidaemia (21%).

The audit of 200 (66.2% response) paediatricians included 8345 patients.

On average paediatricians recorded height and weight for 66.5% of patients (SD 30.0%, range 0-100%).

Of the 296 (12.3%) patients obese by CDC cutpoints, 118 (39.9%) were diagnosed as obese; perceived competence increased the odds of recording this diagnosis but not measurement.

Training levels were low, showed little association with measurement or obesity diagnosis, and skills learnt were not routinely used.

There is a clear need for better paediatrician training in obesity management.

However, care and outcomes for obese children are unlikely to improve unless effective management models can be operationalised systematically.